Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Talent’ Category

The Talent Combine

Forbes reports on the accelerating trend of using programming contests to smoke out the best talent even when it is not looking for a job:

A few years ago such out-of-the-way stars were invisible to U.S. recruiters. Today it’s much easier to spot them. Thanks to a flurry of online programming contests that attract entrants worldwide, it’s possible to identify coders who do Caltech-quality work, even if they live halfway around the world and earned their degrees at Ural State University…

InterviewStreet was the ticket out of Siberia for Yakunin, the programmer from Ekaterinburg. He wowed the hiring engineers at Quora, a knowledge-sharing website in Mountain View, Calif., by being the only person out of more than 700 respondents to win a perfect score on a CodeSprint challenge it sponsored. Often the best coders aren’t eager to apply for a job. They just want to prove their mettle against all comers. Mindful of this dynamic, InterviewStreet moved the bulk of its contests to a website called HackerRank, where most entrants log in with pseudonymous user names. Job hunters authorize the site to reveal their real names to potential employers.

Read Full Post »

Blunt Tools

While data is a game-changer, it’s also important to remember that half-assed data tools are not better than no data tools.  A good example are the horrible software algorithms used to sort through resumes over the last decade:

Algorithms and big data are powerful tools. Wisely used, they can help match the right people with the right jobs. But they must be designed and used by humans, so they can go horribly wrong. Peter Cappelli of the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School of Business recalls a case where the software rejected every one of many good applicants for a job because the firm in question had specified that they must have held a particular job title—one that existed at no other company.

Read Full Post »

The Village Genius

This story — reaffirming everything good about the potential of MOOCs — was on the front page of the Financial Times recently:

Teenage applicants from as far afield as India and Mongolia are catching western colleges’ attention by taking so-called “massive online open courses” designed for older students.

Schoolchildren taking courses on their own initiative already account for about 5 per cent of the 800,000 students at edX, the non-profit online venture founded by Harvard and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Some have used their results to apply to the colleges that pioneered MOOCs.

Amol Bhave, a 17-year-old from Jabalpur, India, learnt last week that he had been accepted to MIT after scoring 97 per cent on edX’s circuits and electronics course. He received the good news on March 14 – or “pi day”, as he put it in a Skype conversation with the FT.

“I am like the first person in my city to get into MIT ever so I have become sort of pretty famous,” he said. “I was so motivated by how we were taught [by edX] that I decided that maybe I belong to MIT after all.”

Mr Bhave came to the attention of MIT faculty members after joining two students he met in the course’s discussion forum to create a follow-up course. Anant Agarwal, edX president and an MIT professor of electrical engineering and computer science, wrote him a letter of recommendation.

The lesson: learning that’s available to all helps surface talent that may otherwise gotten undiscovered.

Read Full Post »

I have long said Kickstarter centrally fit into the talent elevation thesis.  Fast Company puts it well:

“”If you can raise money on Kickstarter, you don’t have to wait around to be green-lighted,” says Matt Porterfield, a Baltimore filmmaker whose Kickstarter-backed movie, I Used to Be Darker, premiered at Sundance. “You green-light your fucking self.”

You green-light yourself–the idea that creative people don’t need intermediaries–has long been one of the Internet’s great promises, and Kickstarter appears to finally deliver on it.”

Read Full Post »

Today on AVC, in response to “doing things you don’t like to do should be an outlier case. not the majority case”:

Yes, doesn’t have to be that way. a lot of times we love what we do but hate the structure in which we do it.

for example, i loved my geeky law practice, but just hated what the law firm structure had become.

talent elevation platforms like kickstarter in the arts, but others in other areas, have the potential to bring that enjoyment back by changing the existing revenue flows and the stagnating institutions that mediate them.

Read Full Post »

Sniffing Out Talent

Second great articulation in the Keith Rabois regards finding hidden talent, a recurring topic on this blog. If you can find unrealized talent, you can have a winning attainable team, by looking forward and making forward-looking bets rather than chasing past success.

These are some characteristics for identifying that talent, per Keith:

  • The candidate can relay incredibly complex ideas in simple terms.

  • The candidate can see things you don’t see. Even within topics you’re fluent in, they’re able to convince you of new points of view or make you realize you’re missing something.

  • They’re relentlessly resourceful. There should be things in their history, whether it’s on or off the résumé, which conveys that they’re able to make things happen, against all odds. If there is a wall in their way, they’ll go over it, under it or become friends with it. They just make things happen and leave you wowed. Any time you have that “Wow!” kind of feeling you need to just hire the person.

  • They’re often contrarian. Peter Thiel now has a popularized way of figuring this out. He asks, “Explain something that you believe, that everybody else believes is wrong.”

Read Full Post »

Unclogging Talent

The early vision of the Internet by DARPA, built on the insight that the network should be completely decentralized with no master computer responsible for sorting the packets and routing them to their destination.  This would make the system more robust and a single failure could not bring the network down.
That insight behind the Internet also sheds light on why well-designed networks can work better for talent elevation.
The old system is based on talent elevated through permission granted by the pyramid point of some bureaucracy.  An expert “taps” someone else as being worthy.  Mistakes or bad intentions are over-weighted, capable of cutting off the growth of talent in a profound way.  The old system maximized the possibility of the system not working because of a single point of failure.
The new system is based on a network without a single point of failure; redundancy is built in.  It is based on openness, accountability, and to minimize the possibility of a choke point from one bad or mistaken actor.  If talent hits one choke point, like a packet, it has opportunities to reroute and find its way to recognition through another route.

Read Full Post »

The simplest articulation of why networks trump institutions (i.e, the central exploration of this blog) just occurred to me.

In institutional-based talent elevation, the following self-reinforcing dynamic usually takes over:

Mediocrity is attracted to Mediocrity.

Many verbs can replace the verb above: reinforces, elevates, supports, produces, recognizes…

But the central point is that it is a loop that is self-reinforcing and hard to get out of.

In contrasts, networks elevate, support and reinforce authentic talent.

Read Full Post »

Everyone Is Good At Something

My comment on AVC today:

“Everyone is good at something”

Yes!

So many great platforms for folks out there to find out what that is and nurture it: blogging, etsy, Youtube, kickstarter, kaggle, sidetour, and on and on.

In a word, networks…

That is, tools that continue to move away from the world in which used to live in where non-networked institutions have the ability (on top of their continuing incentive) to thwart the supply of individual talent to generate market power for themselves.

Talent elevation and opportunity platforms!

Read Full Post »

TrainSpotting

The Economist had a relatively wide-ranging article about online education in its last 2012 issue.  I don’t know about the revenue model, but I do think that MOOCs and talent elevation platforms fit hand in glove, as a way to surfacing rare finds:

A second model is to charge potential employers a fee for spotting suitable recruits among the students. Coursera charges for referrals to its best students.

Widen access to the opportunity to show talent, and then reward that talent.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 64 other followers